skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Some people thought this lecture wasn't interesting, I disagreed. Eileen Neff's sense of composition and balance was astounding. I loved the work with the furniture and the overall illusionist approach to realism. The concept of outside spaces and inside spaces intrigued me. I'd never thought about it but seeing it put together in various ways held my interest. I loved the different media choices which I hear also included cinema.The entire collection read cohesively. In the end it was like a revelation, starting with the end table and the world. It was very well put together.Others argued that what she did didn't exactly require skill. I disagree with that as well. What she does not only requires technical skill but a sort of mental and conceptual discipline that comes with time and maturity. It appears at first that any of us could do some of her work but in truth we can't because, as simple as it appears, we haven't thought of it and how her work was composed and thought out and finished was at a level way beyond a foundation student with budding technical skills.
A more sophisticated Chuck E Cheese coin of sorts, the Arcade Currency. In some places this currency is interchangeable with quarters to play games. When they started using these coins I'm not sure, but they're quickly becoming irrelevant in the gaming world. I snagged this golden coin before it became obsolete.
I spotted this coin on one of my step brother's bottles during the summer. Seeing as he's half Dominican, it made sense for him to have it. I "tricked" him into giving it to me, feigning an innocent interest.
I did two though I don't really like the second one.
This lecture interested me today. It gave me some ideas for myself.I listened while also editing my novel and what she said really helped me as an author and a writer. She said she was just an artist and that we should have fun doing this. We should go outside of the box. We should strive to create characters with our work and with those characters we should be able to communicate. She said that it's about movement and taking from the body. We should take what we love from every aspect of life and change it and give it character and influence. I agree. It gave me a sense of clarity. We are creating characters when we work, whether it be with literal characters in a still life or more abstract characters in other works. For a long time I've never understood the point of abstraction other than physical beauty, but I've been given a taste to why and how it's done. It intrigued me.
On my rush to catch the subway I received this as change for tokens. Though this coin is now virtually worthless, I still find it interesting, a quarter, with a whole in it.
This coin was given to me as change at the Rite Aid, by mistake of course. I quickly realized that this wasn't just an ordinary Canadian penny. It doesn't have Queen Elizabeth on it, the queen on England whose face graces the currency of many countries. The interesting thing is that this coin predates the Queen.
Recently I viewed the Wolgin Exhibition at Tyler.... I didn't exactly get it but I can say that they were very entertaining. When I first walked into the gallery, what first appealed to me was the sound. Sounds could be heard from every part of the large room. What next struck me was, tree? Let me just say that Sanford Biggers and Ryan Trecartin's work stood out the most to me. It could have been the video aspect of it or the overall impact of their imagery but their work remained in my mind the longest.First, Sanford Biggers. That tree really got me. Did he make a tree? Impressive. I saw the video imbedded in the tree trunk. I moved to cover my ears with the headphones. As soon as this occured, it was like I'd entered another world, a twilight zone of sorts. I didn't like it. I felt instantaneously uncomforatble. From the creepy music and imagery to this impending sense of someone lurking behind me, to the gathering of beer bottles that suddenly struck my attention, he worked to create an eery sense of discomfort. When the music and video sped up, it literally frightened me. I couldn't finish watching the video. And nothing ever scares me.Second, Ryan Trecartin. What's with the amputated foot in the sand and the ghostly makeup? came to mind first. The video amused me. I first started watching and then I couldn't stop. Throughout the clownlike, high voiced, seemingly random charade, I kept wondering, what is he trying to say? I already don't understand video, and this one seemed to go even beyond my understanding. I thought, why? He's giving me a lot of specific information from the makeup to the high voices and vibrant colors and the editing but I couldn't decide why. I thought at first that he could be making a comentary on women today because he mainly used men with an audacious amount of make up. But he did use women as well and that just didn't seem to fit. Then I thought, maybe about culture and a sort of Dionysian existence.